Windows server 2012 essentials remote desktop licensing free download

Looking for:

– Windows server 2012 essentials remote desktop licensing free download

Click here to Download


We do not have a domain or any other servers. We only require 5 people from various locations to be able to remotely log into the server and work on a program that is installed on it. However, the setup and configuration of the Remote Desktop Services did not go as planned. After many attempts and various configuration settings, it still doesn’t work.

However, nowhere can I confirm this, I have searched many forums where people are experiencing the same problems, but nowhere can I find answers. If there is anyone out there that might be able to shed some light and maybe point me in the right direction, it would be greatly appreciated.

You will need to use a combination of local group policy, wmi, registry edits, etc. In this scenario there is no need for hyper-v to be installed.

A single Server Standard license would allow you to install it on the physical server, install Hyper-V, and then create two VMs, both running Server Standard. Setting up your servers as VMs is generally not always the preferred way and has many benefits.

For example, say you need a more powerful server in the future. Windows Server Essentials only supports a maximum of two Active sessions, including someone logged on to the physical console. For example, you could have two Active users connected remotely via rdp, but no one logged on to the physical console, or one remote user and one at the console. These two sessions are used for administration purposes. You may use the Remote Web Access feature to access PCs on your internal network including the server via Remote Desktop from outside of the office.

If you need to have 5 users logged on to the server via Remote Desktop then you will need to have a separate Server not Essentials for this purpose.

This does not need to be a separate physical machine. A single Server Standard license would allow the above since it allows two virtual instances plus physical for hyper-v only. What if it is not the domain controller, wouldn’t that work? Or is it just as simple as to say that the Essential version doesn’t support more that 2 RDP connections even when you have licenses for it?

My second question is, To have Server Not essentials with Hyper V installed, would I still need to have two VM’s running just to het 5 people connected? Or can I have just that, and install my program directly on there so users can log in and use it?

The actual end result we are looking for is simply to have 5 people connected concurrently, doesn’t matter what OS they log onto, but it still needs to be onto the same machine. We are obviously also looking to save costs wherever possible. I do not want to go and buy Server Standard if there is another way of doing this. Even if there is maybe different software out there that allows this. The moderator in thread suggested buying a single Server Standard to install on bare Server?

In my example I am only suggesting that a single Server Standard license be purchased, which covers the bare server and the 2 VMs. Why would anyone want Essentials or Foundation then? Oh boy, you get 25 or 15 cal’s, but look what you give up. IMHO, both products are scams. Only to find out you have to purchase Standard anyhow so you can have your RDP server. So the “deal” is Microsoft gets to sell you two licenses.

Why we are at it, why would any one want anyhow? Here are the gotcha’s with You cannot install Exchange on a Domain Controller 3. You cannot install RDP on the same server with Exchange 4. They cost extra. When all these roles and services would install and play in perfect harmony on a single R2 computer. Thats right, one box. Now MS says, “we never supported that”. Of course, they are in the business of selling licenses. No, its not because with OU’s and policies you can lock the terminal server RDP role down so tight as to not be a risk Yes, that is true, but only a man-in-the middle, inside your own office.

I will use R2 until MS comes up with a real deal that is not 3X the complexity and 2X the licensing fees as is Maybe in they will get it right! I cannot express in words the frustration I had to go through in setting up the 3 instances of Server Standard. And that for a company that has 12 users, and only 4 wants to be able to log in remotely to do their work. I am still battling with the 3 instances and I followed all the online forums available. It sucks that Microsoft has to complicate things that was working perfectly in previous versions!!

Wow, such hostility! I know this thread is a few months old, but I wanted to give a second opinion to the previous two posts, for those of you who get here by searching as I just did. With Server you have the downgrade right to a previous version or a lesser version. Then, use one of your 2 virtual licenses to stand up a Server Essentials VM. Another thread I saw mentioned that you may have to purchase separate user CALs for the second server, but I don’t think that is the case.

You are now allowed to create a physical Hyper-V host on which to locate a virtualized Essentials server. In my previous scenario, I don’t see where this would be a benefit, but if you just want the benefit of virtualization, now you will have it for no extra cost with the R2 version.

I still think Microsoft “screwed the pooch” by cancelling Small Business Server Standard, but it is now a moot point. The Essentials product gives customers the main feature they wanted in SBS which is a robust remote access to their desktops and with RWA being built from the core of RDS, it actually give a user or consultant a lot of latitude in what they can configure with this inexpensive server.

This would be true if you do not make your Foundation server a Domain Controller. That’s what all the fuss is about. With Server and R2, you can do it not recommended , but it works like a dream come true. With Server it will give you and error. You can force the role down its pipes, but it breaks other stuff, as described elsewhere in this thread.

With Foundation, you can have two Administrator accounts that can access RDS at the same time, but that’s it. Two, and they have to be admins. I am guessing you have not tried to install the role or licensing server, or activate Remote Web Apps, or you would be crying like the rest of us as we expend our valuable time setting up VM’s for RDS.

I eventually bought the Standard version, and even with that, you need at least one VM together with the actual machine in order to setup a proper RDS environment. This is depressing. Our group of small offices ran SBS and many years with terminal servers joined to the domains. After the usual issues with hardware failures and viruses, we moved our email, SharePoint, and website to Microsoft cloud, which is great and economical and took a load off my mind.

All I have left is to run our QB accounting through terminal services and now I find out the Essentials we just bought is worthless for that. The datasheet on it seems misleading: ” for accessing applications and data from virtually anywhere you have an Internet connection and using almost any device. I need terminal services for four offices and concurrent users. I avoided Foundation as all my machines are dual processor. The essential should really have a disclaimer that it’s worthless for terminal services.

I didn’t wipe off my SBS and simplify with cloud services to deploy 3 virtual machines. What a cluster. It’s not a perfect idea or implementation yet, but they’re certainly making moves toward that direction. Of course, you can make all the stuff work on Server R2, Domain controller by adding the sever to the Terminal Server group.

We had 15 servers running this way, and the largest one with 30 users. The only blasphemy in Mother Microsoft’s eyes is the remote possibility someone INSIDE your organization with login credentials and a computer hacker degree could possibly Surfing the web on a remote desktop domain controller represents a real risk.

If they compromise the users remote desktop, they’re on the DC and could have their way with it. Not to say they couldn’t anyhow Pay homage to Mother Microsoft because she knows what is best for us, and let the stock soar as Mother wishes with ever increasing software sales and licensing fees. The whining and screams of the masses as the software gamma knife exactingly strikes bone and vacuums out the marrow will not be heard in the Redmond ivory towers. She never take all the marrow so you can regenerate and serve again in a few years.

Go ye willing into the Borg. You will be absorbed the easy way or the hard way. Resistance is futile. Embrace your Mother, its much easier this way. Windows Server Essentials only supports a maximum of two Active sessions for admins. If you purchase the Standard Edition, you can also downgrade to essentials as a virtual machine than you can install RDS on th estandard Edition on the essentials Domain Controller. I’m not sure if it’s clear to everyone as some of the terminology seems to have been interchanged here.

Just wanted to add hopefully a little clarity as to what these two technologies are designed to do as they are really quite different from each other. I appreciate your attempt at clarity, but to me – a complete dinosaur re: server OS’s – the clarification is still somewhat muddy. This, of course is no surprise since after 55 years in IT, I suddenly feel like I’ve never even seen a computer before, let alone manage one.

All these initials and acronyms completely mystify me, and attempts to find out what they mean are met with just more initials and acronyms; a vicious circle.


ヤフオク! -windows server の中古品・新品・未使用品一覧.


More information came out since then so I thought a single post would be best. Make sure you follow this post by reading my post on licensing for virtualisation of Windows Server I will not be answering any further questions on this post.

My job is to work with our sales people, supporting Microsoft partners who resell product to end customers. My focus is on System Center and that brings in Hyper-V and Forefront, but anything that is anyway technical tends to find its way to my desk. And you know what? And these issues confuse the hell out of people.

The recent changes to System Center licensing simplified our conversations quite a bit. This evening Microsoft released the details of Windows Server licensing. There is also a datasheet and a FAQ with more details. What were the shelf prices before with R2? Bear in mind that the shown prices are the from the Open NL price list, the most expensive of the volume license types. They are shown to give an indication of past and present. Enterprise came with all the same features and scalability, with a limit of technical limit of 8 CPUs in the physical server.

Licensing-wise, it allowed 4 VMs on the licensed host to run Windows for free. You could double the licensing for the host to get 8 VMs for free … but do the math and you might as well buy Datacenter edition then. Standard Edition had limited scalability and features, e. For Datacenter there is 1 change: You buy 1 copy of Datacenter and it includes 2 processors. The whole minimum-ofprocs-per-host thing confused people. We continue to have the unlimited virtualisation licensing.

That means if you buy 1 copy of Datacenter for a 2 CPU host any virtualisation and you get unlimited installations of Windows Server or lower any edition for unlimited VMs on that host … no changes there! The other change for Standard is that it will match the Datacenter model.

The Standard license will cover you for 2 CPUs in a server. If you want 4 CPUs, then you need 2 copies of Standard. Foundation is also for single CPU servers, such as a micro-server. More on Essentials later.

OK Enterprise owners, just like the old Star Trek storyline, it is g-o-n-e. Here is your replacement strategy:. The answer to that question was posted on the SBS blog. Windows Server Essentials will support up to 25 users and 50 devices. The idea behind Essentials is that it will be the successor to SBS. Windows Server Essentials has been designed to give you the flexibility to choose which applications and services run on-premises and which run in the cloud.

It allows you to take advantage of cloud-based messaging offerings while enjoying an integrated management experience by subscribing to Office or a hosted Exchange service. If you prefer a fully on-premises solution, you have the option of running Exchange Server on a second server either as a physical or virtual machine alongside Essentials with the same integrated management experience. Windows Server Essentials can also be used as a platform to run line-of-business applications and other on-premises workloads, as well as to provide an integrated management experience when running cloud-based applications and services, such as email, collaboration, online backup, and more.

It will remain available through the OEM channel until December 31, , and will remain available in all other current channels until June 30, Long-story short, the small business customer is now getting a 25 user version of Windows that does not come with Exchange.

My analysis on this: the writing has been on the wall for a long time. At least locally, Microsoft has made huge investments in trying to educate train partners on the strategy, sales, and technical levels. We have to move with the times cos the times are moving. This upgrade right will be reflected upon your agreement renewal but you are entitled to use the granted product upon its availability.

Buying the Datacenter editions? Anyone running physical installations of Windows Web Server R2: this is your prompt to join the rest of us in the 21 st century and virtualize those web servers … NOW! If you put 2 web servers on to a host, your new Windows Server Standard edition covers you for your virtual web server licensing. The cost is the price difference between the editions.

None of the rules change. You continue to license clients for the highest version of Windows Server that they use. No changes to report here either. And a volume license can be moved once every 90 days. And that applies to you folks who think they are able to under-license their hosts even VMware and Xen for VMs; you have to license for the maximum number of Windows VMs on that host, even for 1 second.

The correct way to license is to stack your Standard editions on each of the hosts allowing for the highest possible number of VMs, even for 1 second or buy Datacenter which makes sense once you need more than 10 VMs per host based on this retail pricing. I think the only genuine confusion will be that these changes and savings will sound too good to be true. It comes in Standard or Datacenter. They both come with all the scalability and all the features, including Hyper-V.

Can i confirm that you mean to say that if i purchase Server R2 Enterprise now less than 90 days before Server is out then i can license myself for for free? It would be nice to get the new replica features that are missing from without having to buy yet more licences. No SA, no upgrade rights. You can add SA if you bought in the last 90 days.

Contact your reseller. So let me try this scenario out — we used to buy enterprise for the four VM licenses. Now, with standard, we have to buy two copies if we want four VM licenses. No biggie. Win in my book! Is it correct? Need this information, please respond. Remember you get much more than upgrade rights with SA. How do the new server licensing rules work for an SA customer who will retain the installed R2 instances for a while?

Will the licensing rules for my installed R2 Standard licenses transform into the licensing rules for Standard even thought I am not installing Standard?

Best to double-check with your LAR or reseller. Can you clarify on this one? You need to license those devices using something like VDA.

I had 10 users and i think i need 10 CALs. This setup was decided on to provide full protection against downtime due to a single host failure and 3 lower hosts instead of 2 higher was decided on as it was significantly more cost-effective to scale out rather than up. If they were all on a single host, 1x 08R2 Enterprise would cover it or 2x Std downgraded and all would be well.

You can buy 4x standards with one instance each or 1x enterprise which give you four instances. Your cluster: wrong. You license for the max number of VMs that can exist on your node at any one time, including the really bad day. Putting in 3 nodes for 4 VMs is beyond mad — power, licensing not just Windows , … Read the blog post again. If your reseller advised you to adopt this config then you need to find a different reseller IMO.

This is extraordinary news! This cuts our virtualization costs by half with datacenter now covering 2 procs. Go read the article again. The price for datacentre stays the same. There is no replacement for Windows Home Server. Just let me buy the quantity of licenses I need and do with them what I want. You should read the post again. Licensing for VMs is done at the host level, not at the VM level. Great article, really helped me get to grips with licencing my forthcoming cluster. Is this correct?

We are a small accounting firm that will be migrating from Server to R2 Standard in the coming weeks as our hardware and the apps we run are not yet certified on Can we buy a Server Standard license and downgrade to ? Would this allow us to then upgrade to at a later date? I have an Windows Server Datacenter Retail license. Now i would like to run a physical server with Hyper-V only Hyper-V. So now i created a first virtual system.

I used the same license from above two install the Windows Server Datacenter again. After that i created a second virtual system. Similar two the first i installed Windows Server Datacenter again with the same license. Do I get same amount of virtual instances on any virtualization platform?


– Windows server 2012 essentials remote desktop licensing free download

Datacenter/StandardとEssentialsの最も大きな違いは、ライセンスモデルです。このライセンスモデルは、Windows Server から採用されました。 含まれない The client workstations are all Windows 7 Professional. This combination has worked very well for everyone. However, with the “free” Windows 10